水-煤油萃取实验中苯甲酸浓度不同测定方法的比较

doi:10.3866/PKU.DXHX201807045

University Chemistry ›› 2019, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 66-72.doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX201807045

• Chemistry Laboratory • Previous Articles Next Articles

Method Comparison for Determining the Concentration of Benzoic Acid in the Experiment of Water-Kerosene Extraction

Yalan ZHONG*(),Yeshuo LIU,Siwei ZHANG,Yikai WANG,Chi HUANG,Xiaoling WANG*()

National Demonstration Center for Experimental Chemistry Education(Wuhan University), College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, P. R. China

Received:2018-07-27 Accepted:2018-11-28 Published:2019-04-28
Contact: Yalan ZHONG,Xiaoling WANG E-mail:ylzhong@whu.edu.cn;wangxiaoling@whu.edu.cn
Supported by:
武汉大学实验技术项目(WHU-2016-SYJS-08);武汉大学开放实验项目

Abstract

Abstract:

In the experiment of extracting benzoic acid from kerosene with tap water as the extractant, the concentration of benzoic acid is usually determined by volumetric titration. The error of this method is large and the material balance is poor. In this paper, a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to separate benzoic acid and kerosene with methanol as a mobile phase. The quantitative analysis was made by using UV-Vis detector. Compared with the titration analysis, the accuracy of HPLC was higher and the recovery rate of material balance was up to 95%.

Key words: Liquid-liquid extraction, High performance liquid chromatography, Material balance

MSC2000:

G64:O6

Yalan ZHONG,Yeshuo LIU,Siwei ZHANG,Yikai WANG,Chi HUANG,Xiaoling WANG. Method Comparison for Determining the Concentration of Benzoic Acid in the Experiment of Water-Kerosene Extraction[J].University Chemistry, 2019, 34(4): 66-72.

流动相的组成(甲醇:水，体积比)	分离情况
0 : 1	苯甲酸的峰掩盖在煤油的峰之中
1 : 2	出现两个峰，但不能完全分离
1 : 1	苯甲酸与煤油峰仍有重叠
1 : 0	苯甲酸与煤油组分能够基线分离(图3)

运行时间/min	原料油浓度/(g·L^-1)	原料油浓度的RSD/%	萃取相浓度/(g·L^-1)	萃取相浓度的RSD/%	萃余相浓度/(g·L^-1)	萃余相浓度的RSD/%	萃取率/%
25	1.1608	2.14	0.2025	2.13	0.3673	5.44	68.40
45	1.1608	2.14	0.2829	1.03	0.3744	2.67	67.70

桨叶转速/(r·min^-1)	原料油浓度/(g·L^-1)	原料油浓度的RSD/%	萃取相浓度/(g·L^-1)	萃取相浓度的RSD/%	萃余相浓度/(g·L^-1)	萃余相浓度的RSD/%	萃取率/%
190	1.4234	0.35	0.03391	0	1.102	1.28	22.60
295	1.1608	2.14	0.2025	2.13	0.3673	5.44	68.40
349	1.1938	1.57	0.3193	1.25	0.1413	5.00	88.20

桨叶转速/(r·min^-1)	原料油浓度/(g·L^-1)	原料油浓度的RSD/%	萃取相浓度/(g·L^-1)	萃取相浓度的RSD/%	萃余相浓度/(g·L^-1)	萃余相浓度的RSD/%	回收率E/%
190	1.4537	1.24	0.1791	0.46	1.1803	0.94	97.60
190	(1.4234)	(0.35)	(0.0264)	(6.19)	(1.1267)	(1.33)	(81.60)
295	1.2691	1.78	0.6314	5.47	0.4056	0.86	98.30
295	(1.1608)	(2.14)	(0.2829)	(1.03)	(0.3744)	(2.67)	(64.70)
349	1.0985	2.08	0.6381	0.51	0.2068	1.80	96.30
349	(1.1938)	(1.57)	(0.4662)	(1.71)	(0.1872)	(2.67)	(67.80)

桨叶转速/(r·min^-1)	以油相计算的萃取率/%	以水相计算的萃取率/%
190	18.8 (20.8)	16.4 (2.5)
295	68.0 (67.7)	66.3 (32.5)
349	81.2 (84.3)	77.5 (52.1)

Method Comparison for Determining the Concentration of Benzoic Acid in the Experiment of Water-Kerosene Extraction

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 7

Related Articles 5

Metrics

Recommended 0

桨叶转速/(r·min^-1)	传质单元数	传质单元高度/m	体积总传质系数
190	0.19 (0.026)	3.95 (28.85)	775 (106)
295	1.29 (0.46)	0.58 (1.63)	5258 (1875)
349	1.83 (1.07)	0.41 (0.70)	7460 (4361)

分析对象	配制浓度/(mol·L^-1)	滴定浓度/(mol·L^-1)	RSD/%	偏差/%
苯甲酸-自来水	0.002802	0.001132	2.74	59.60
苯甲酸-去离子水	0.002229	0.002198	0.72	1.40

1	马江权; 魏科年; 韶晖; 冷一欣. 化工原理实验, 上海: 华东理工大学出版社, 2016.
2	王喆; 窦梅; 南碎飞. 高效化学工程学报, 2016, 30 (4), 822.
3	张金利; 郭翠梨. 化工基础实验, 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2006.
4	祝伟霞; 魏蔚; 杨冀州; 刘亚风. 中国国境卫生检疫杂志, 2005, 28 (5), 280. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9770.2005.05.016
5	袁磊; 林芳; 张丽; 王一欣; 王豆. 食品科学技术学报, 2017, 35 (4), 72.
6	傅献彩. 大学化学(上册), 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1999.
7	柳玉英; 王平; 刘青; 蔺红桃. 大学化学, 2016, 31 (9), 43.

[1]	Guang Yang, Kaige Shi. A Brief Introduction to the New Regulations of the Nomenclature of Inorganic Compounds [J]. University Chemistry, 2020, 35(9): 178-184.
[2]	Wang Yuqi, Zhong Ziting, Pan Yingying, Liu Shuai, Lin Xinyuan, Lin Gengzhong, Pang Haoran, Zhang Weiguang, He Guangping. Propulsion Performance of Rocket Fuel through Bomb Calorimeter and Computer Simulation [J]. University Chemistry, 2020, 35(4): 50-59.
[3]	Zongxun TANG,Yaxian ZHU,Bin CUI. Periodic Anomalies [J]. University Chemistry, 2019, 34(12): 13-21.
[4]	Wenqing ZHANG,Guang YANG. The Use of Subjunctive Mood in Chemical Literatures [J]. University Chemistry, 2019, 34(2): 76-80.
[5]	Shaoqian LIU,Jiaguo WANG,Shian ZHONG. Comparison of Molecular Acidity of Proton Acids [J]. University Chemistry, 2018, 33(4): 57-65.