大学化学

上一篇    下一篇

从传统有机反应到金属催化反应:机理认知转变的教学思路

袁呈山, 李云, 惠新平, 邵向锋, 李多修, 刘琼, 刘子桐, 刘强   

  1. 兰州大学化学化工学院, 天然产物化学全国重点实验室, 甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-30 修回日期:2026-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘强, 刘子桐 E-mail:liuqiang@lzu.edu.cn;liuzt@lzu.edu.cn Qiang Liu, Zitong Liu

From Traditional Organic Reactions to Metal-Catalyzed Reactions: A Teaching Approach for Mechanistic Cognitive Transition

Chengshan Yuan, Yun Li, Xinping Hui, Xiangfeng Shao, DuoXiu Li, Qiong Liu, Zitong Liu, Qiang Liu   

  1. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Natural Product Chemistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
  • Received:2026-03-30 Revised:2026-05-20
  • Contact: Qiang Liu, Zitong Liu E-mail:liuqiang@lzu.edu.cn;liuzt@lzu.edu.cn

摘要: 随着金属有机化学在现代有机合成中的重要性不断提升,过渡金属催化反应的相关内容已逐渐引入本科有机化学课程。然而,在教学实践中发现,学生在学习过程中往往难以实现从传统有机反应机理向金属催化反应机理的顺利过渡。传统有机反应主要基于共价键的均裂或异裂过程,通常通过自由基或极性反应模式进行解释;而过渡金属催化反应则涉及金属–碳键形成、底物配位以及催化循环等新的机理特征。这种机理模式的差异在一定程度上增加了学生的理解难度。针对这一问题,本文从本科生机理认知模式出发,分析传统有机反应机理与金属催化机理之间的差异,提出以机理认知转变为导向的教学设计思路。通过比较传统极性反应与过渡金属催化反应在电子结构、底物活化方式及催化循环等方面的差异,重点阐明Pd–C键与传统有机金属试剂反应模式之间的本质区别,从而帮助学生避免将Pd–C键简单类比为传统碳负离子结构,并建立对金属催化反应机理的准确认知框架。以Suzuki、Heck和Sonogashira等典型交叉偶联反应为教学案例,阐述该教学思路在本科有机化学课堂中的具体实施。教学实践表明,该方法能够帮助学生建立对过渡金属催化反应机理的整体认识,促进其由线性机理思维向催化循环机理思维的转变,从而提升相关内容的教学效果。

关键词: 金属有机化学, 过渡金属催化, 反应机理, 机理认知转变, 有机化学教学

Abstract: As organometallic chemistry continues to gain prominence in modern organic synthesis, transition metal-catalyzed reactions have been progressively incorporated into undergraduate organic chemistry curricula. However, pedagogical experience reveals that students frequently struggle to make the conceptual transition from traditional organic reaction mechanisms to those involving transition metal catalysis. While conventional organic reactions predominantly involve homolytic or heterolytic bond cleavage processes typically explained through radical or polar reaction pathways, transition metalcatalyzed reactions introduce distinct mechanistic characteristics including metal-carbon bond formation, substrate coordination, and catalytic cycles. These fundamental differences in mechanistic paradigms present significant learning challenges. To address this issue, we examine the cognitive models of undergraduate students and analyze the conceptual gaps between traditional organic reaction mechanisms and transition metal-catalyzed processes. We propose a teaching strategy specifically designed to facilitate this mechanistic cognitive transition. Through systematic comparison of traditional polar reactions with transition-metal-catalyzed reactions in terms of electronic structure, substrate activation modes, and catalytic cycles, we highlight the essential differences between Pd–C bond reactivity and conventional organometallic reagents. This approach prevents students from making oversimplified analogies between Pd–C bonds and classical carbanion structures, while establishing a proper conceptual framework for understanding transition-metal-catalyzed reaction mechanisms. Using representative cross-coupling reactions (Suzuki, Heck, and Sonogashira) as teaching examples, we demonstrate the practical implementation of this pedagogical approach in undergraduate organic chemistry courses. Classroom assessments indicate that this method effectively helps students develop a comprehensive understanding of transition metal-catalyzed reaction mechanisms, facilitating their transition from linear mechanistic thinking to catalytic cycle-based reasoning, thereby improving overall teaching outcomes.

Key words: Organometallic chemistry, Transition metal catalysis, Reaction mechanisms, Mechanistic cognitive transition, Organic chemistry teaching