大学化学

上一篇    下一篇

工程认证背景下课程质量评价与改进机制的构建——以化工专业实验课为例

叶美玲, 陈翠雪, 梁汉锋, 陈嘉欣   

  1. 厦门大学化学化工学院, 化学工程与生物工程系, 福建 厦门 361005
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-16 录用日期:2026-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 叶美玲, 陈翠雪 E-mail:mlye@xmu.edu.cn;cxchen@xmu.edu.cn Meiling Ye, Cuixue Chen

Construction of course quality evaluation and improvement mechanism in the context of engineering accreditation: a case study of chemical engineering laboratory courses

Meiling Ye, Cuixue Chen, Hanfeng Liang, Jiaxin Chen   

  1. Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chemical Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian Province, China
  • Received:2026-04-16 Accepted:2026-06-04
  • Contact: Meiling Ye, Cuixue Chen E-mail:mlye@xmu.edu.cn;cxchen@xmu.edu.cn

PDF

2

赞

摘要： 在工程认证“以学生为中心”“持续改进”理念的引导下，课程组通过完善成绩评分标准，建立课程目标达成度评价体系，开展教学过程性与终结性评价，构建了较为完善的多维度课程质量评价体系；通过教学研讨，问卷调查，形成“教-学-评-改”闭环持续改进机制。实践表明，教学评价体系的改革有效提升了教学质量与学生综合能力，为相关课程的教学改革和质量评价提供参考。

关键词: 教学改革, 课程质量评价, 持续改进, 工程教育认证, 化工专业实验

Abstract: Guided by the concepts of “student-centeredness” and “continuous improvement” in engineering accreditation, the course team has constructed a relatively comprehensive multi-dimensional curriculum quality evaluation system. This was achieved by optimizing the grading criteria, establishing an evaluation system for curriculum objective attainment, and implementing both process-based and summative evaluations throughout the teaching process. Through teaching seminars and questionnaire surveys, a closed-loop continuous improvement mechanism of “teaching–learning–evaluation–revision” has been developed and improved. Practice has demonstrated that the reform of the teaching evaluation system has effectively enhanced teaching quality and students’ comprehensive abilities, thereby providing a valuable reference for the teaching reform and quality evaluation of related courses.

Key words: Teaching reform, Course quality evaluation, Continuous improvement, Engineering education accreditation, Chemical engineering laboratory courses