大学化学 >> 2025, Vol. 40 >> Issue (6): 77-84.doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202405169

所属专题： 非化学类专业化学课程建设与教学改革

教学研究与改革 上一篇    下一篇

新工科背景下大学化学课程创新与实践

沈海云1, 刘禹彤2, 江文革1, 杨秋华1   

  1. 1 天津大学理学院化学系, 化学化工国家级实验教学示范中心(天津大学), 天津 300354;
    2 天津大学教务处, 天津 300354
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-27 录用日期:2024-08-14 发布日期:2025-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘禹彤, 杨秋华 E-mail:effyyliu0118@163.com;qiuhuay@tju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    天津大学第三批课程思政教学改革项目(111)；天津大学2022–2023年本科教材建设项目(108)

Innovation and Practice of General Chemistry Courses under the Background of Emerging Engineering Education

Haiyun Shen1, Yutong Liu2, Wenge Jiang1, Qiuhua Yang1   

  1. 1 National Demonstration Center for Experimental Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Education, Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, China;
    2 The Office of Academic Affairs, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, China
  • Received:2024-05-27 Accepted:2024-08-14 Published:2025-06-20
  • Contact: LIU Yutong, YANG Qiuhua E-mail:effyyliu0118@163.com;qiuhuay@tju.edu.cn

PDF

300

赞

摘要： 在新工科建设背景下，天津大学化学系对大学化学课程进行了创新与改革，以提升非化学化工专业学生的科学素养和创新能力。针对学生化学知识差异、课程与新工科建设的支撑不足，以及育人功能发挥不充分等问题，课程组从教学内容、教学方法、考核评价等方面入手，实施了系统性改革，包括优化课程内容、建设教学资源、创新教学模式等。学生反馈显示，改革显著提升了满意度和教学效果，有效促进了学生能力的提升。未来，课程组计划进一步优化教学内容、探索考核评价新方法，并发展数字化教育，以更好地适应大类招生和新工科建设的需求，强化大学化学课程的支撑作用和育人功能。

关键词: 新工科, 非化学化工专业, 大学化学, 课程改革, 教学创新, 人才培养

Abstract: Under the background of emerging engineering education, the Department of Chemistry of Tianjin University has implemented innovations and reforms in the “General Chemistry” course to enhance the scientific literacy and innovation ability of students from non-chemistry and chemical engineering majors. The reform addresses issues such as disparities in students’ chemical knowledge, insufficient alignment between the course and engineering construction, and underutilization of the course’s educational potential. The course team has carried out systematic reforms across several areas, including course content, teaching methods, and assessment and evaluation. These reforms involve optimizing course material, developing teaching resources, and introducing innovative teaching models. Feedback from students indicates that the reform has significantly improved satisfaction and teaching effectiveness, effectively promoting the improvement of students’ abilities. In the future, the course team plans to further optimize the teaching content, explore new methods of assessment and evaluation, and develop digital education to better meet the demands of large-category enrollment and emerging engineering construction, thereby enhancing the supporting and educational functions of the General Chemistry course.

Key words: Emerging engineering education, Non-chemistry and chemical engineering majors, General chemistry, Curriculum reform, Teaching innovation, Talent cultivation