大学化学

上一篇    下一篇

基于课程组协同与OBE理念的农科公共化学课程思政一体化模式探索与实践

张大伟1,2, 王艳1, 王嵩1   

  1. 1 吉林大学化学学院, 吉林 长春 130012;
    2 国家教材建设重点研究基地(高等学校理学教材研究), 吉林 长春 130012
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-10 修回日期:2026-05-09
  • 通讯作者: 王艳 E-mail:wangy2011@jlu.edu.cn Yan Wang
  • 基金资助:
    教育部产学合作协同育人项目(231002331015302)；吉林省高教科研课题(JGJX25C021,JGJX25D0054， JGJX25D0078)；吉林大学教师教学发展研究项目(JFZX2025029, JFZX2025030)

Exploration and practice of the integrated ideological and political education model for agricultural public chemistry courses based on curriculum team collaboration and obe concept

Dawei Zhang1,2, Yan Wang1, Song Wang1   

  1. 1 College of Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Jilin Province, China;
    2 National Key Research Base for Textbook Development (Research on Science Textbooks for Higher Education), Changchun 130012, Jilin Province, China
  • Received:2026-03-10 Revised:2026-05-09
  • Contact: Yan Wang E-mail:wangy2011@jlu.edu.cn

PDF

5

赞

摘要： 面向新农科人才培养需求，针对农科公共化学基础课程组在课程思政建设中存在的课程间各自为战、思政元素碎片化、知识传授与价值引领“两张皮”、评价体系单一、顶层设计不足等问题，立足协同效应理论，遵循学生中心、产出导向(OBE)教育理念，构建“课程组协同+四维一体化”课程思政育人新模式。以农科公共化学基础课程组为有机整体，实现课程间纵向分层递进、横向分工关联的跨课程协同育人；在课程组内开展教学目标与内容、教学方法与资源、教学考核与评价、教学团队建设四维一体化系统设计，系统构建出课程思政工作体系、知识体系、教学体系，形成“目标引领-内容支撑-方法保障-评价检验”的完整育人闭环。实践表明，该模式显著提升学生科学素养、批判性思维与社会责任感，为高校农科公共化学课程组课程思政建设提供可借鉴、可复制的实践范式。

关键词: 农科公共化学, 学科基础课程组, OBE理念, 课程思政, 一体化育人, 课程组协同

Abstract: In response to the talent training requirements of the New Agricultural Science initiative, the public basic chemistry curriculum group for agricultural disciplines encounters typical deficiencies in ideological and political construction, including disjointed curriculum development, fragmented ideological and political elements, disconnection between knowledge imparting and value guidance, a single evaluation system, and insufficient top-level design. Based on the synergy theory and adhering to the student-centered and outcome-based education (OBE) philosophy, this paper constructs a new ideological and political education model featuring “curriculum group collaboration and four-dimensional integration”. Taking the public basic chemistry curriculum group for agriculture as an organic whole, the model realizes crosscurriculum collaborative education with progressive hierarchical design in the vertical dimension and complementary interconnected layout in the horizontal dimension. A systematic four-dimensional integrated design is implemented covering teaching objectives and content, teaching methods and resources, teaching assessment and evaluation, and teaching team construction. On this basis, the systematic working framework, knowledge system and teaching system for curriculum ideological and political education are established, forming a complete closed-loop education system of “goal orientation, content support, method guarantee and evaluation inspection”. Practical results indicate that the proposed model significantly enhances students’scientific literacy, critical thinking and sense of social responsibility. It provides a referable and replicable practical paradigm for the curriculum-based ideological and political construction of public basic chemistry courses for agricultural disciplines in universities.

Key words: General chemistry for agriculture, Disciplinary basic curriculum group, Outcome-based education, Ideological and political education, Integrated talent cultivation, Curriculum group collaboration