全英文研究型教学效果探讨——基于有机材料化学课学生问卷调查分析

doi:10.3866/PKU.DXHX201808014

Abstract

Abstract:

The research-oriented course lectured in English is a valuable teaching method aimed at training professionals with high innovation abilities. As a subjected course for undergraduates majored in materials chemistry, the research-oriented course, organic materials chemistry has been taught in English for years. In order to know the English level and demands of students and our teaching effects, we design two questionnaires for the survey used at the beginning and at the end of the course, respectively. The analysis of the survey shows that the students have good English level and have desires to study the course in English. Moreover, the students are highly satisfied with our teaching effect, such as the teaching materials, English teaching, teaching contents, course syllabus, and teaching methods. The result of the survey suggests that not only the research-oriented lectures in English is feasible, but also the teaching effects is good.

Key words: Organic materials chemistry, Teaching solely in English, Research-oriented teaching, Questionnaire survey, Teaching effect

Liping WANG. Discussion on the Teaching Effects of Lectures in English Based on Questionnaire Surveys of Organic Material Chemistry[J].University Chemistry, 2019, 34(4): 26-33.

Figures/Tables 3

设置的问题	选项及回答某选项的百分比
1.你认为双语课的教材应选择	A英文原版	B影印版	C中文教材	D中英文教材结合
材化11	40.63%	21.88%	9.38%	28.13%
材化12	59.38%	9.38%	0%	31.25%
2.你认为本课程的教材选择	A很好	B好	C中等	D一般	E不合适
材化11	12.5%	75%	9.38%	3.13%	0%
材化12	35.48%	58.07%	6.45%	0%	0%
3.你对本课程英文讲授的总体满意程度	A很满意	B满意	C基本满意	D不满意	E很不满意
材化11	34.78%	53.13%	12.5%	0%	0%
材化12	68.75%	31.25%	0%	0%	0%
4.本课程使你在哪些方面有较大收获	A专业知识	B综合英语水平	C英语口语	D英语听力	E英语写作	F英语专业词汇
材化11	14.29%	30.36%	5.36%	7.14%	1.78%	37.5%
材化12	16.88%	14.29%	18.18%	6.49%	3.90%	40.26%
5.与汉语课程相比，你对双语课的学习	A更感兴趣	B同样感兴趣	C不感兴趣	D投入时间更多	E投入时间差不多	F投入时间更少
材化11	15.56%	33.33%	4.44%	22.22%	15.56%	8.89%
材化12	25.58%	32.56%	2.33%	13.95%	18.65%	6.98%
6.你认为本课程的内容	A太难	B难度适中	C太简单	D安排合理	E安排比较合理	F安排不合理
材化11	0%	62.16%	5.41%	21.62%	10.81%	0%
材化12	3.03%	60.61%	6.06%	18.18%	12.12%	0%
7.你最喜欢哪一部分内容	A化学基础知识	B有机化学反应	C与理论有关部分	D现代有机材料	E其他	F无意见
材化11	34.88%	20.93%	13.95%	23.26%	4.65%	2.33%
材化12	35.14%	21.62%	8.11%	32.43%	0%	2.70%
8.你认为双语课可以采取哪些教学方式	A启发式	B讨论式	C问题式	D师生互动	E其他
材化11	28%	38%	10%	24%	0%
材化12	13.95%	39.54%	9.30%	37.21%	0%
9.你对presentation部分的总体看法	A很好	B好	C比较好	D一般	E差	F须改进
材化11	15.15%	45.45%	15.15%	9.09%	3.03%	12.12%
材化12	24.24%	33.33%	30.30%	6.06%	0%	6.06%
10.你对讨论课的总体看法	A很好	B好	C比较好	D一般	E差	F须改进
材化11	12.12%	48.48%	18.18%	6.06%	0%	15.15%
材化12	26.47%	41.18%	17.65%	2.94%	0%	11.76%
11.你认为本课程的课堂教学总体上：A师生互动	a较多	b可以	c比较少	d很少	e须改进
材化11	44.83%	44.83%	10.34%	0%	0%
材化12	37.5%	53.12%	0%	6.25%	3.13%
12.你认为本课程的课堂教学总体上：B课堂气氛	a活跃	b比较活跃	c不活跃	d沉闷	e须改进
材化11	10.34%	68.97%	13.79%	3.45%	3.45%
材化12	29.03%	58.07%	0%	6.45%	6.45%
13.你认为本课程的课堂教学总体上：C学生参与	a较多	b可以	c比较少	d很少	E须改进
材化11	27.59%	65.52%	3.45%	3.45%	0%
材化12	37.93%	58.62%	3.45%	0%	0%

设置的问题	选项及回答某选项的百分比
1.你的英语水平	A已过4级 29.41%	B已过6级 68.65%	C未过4级 2.94%	D其他 0%
2.你开始学英语的时间	A幼儿园 14.71%	B小学 58.82%	C初中 26.47%	D其他 0%
3.你对英语学习的兴趣	A很有兴趣 11.76%	B比较有兴趣 44.12%	C兴趣不高 29.41%	D没有兴趣 29.41%
4.英语听、说、读、写、译几种能力中，你认为自己哪(几)方面能力较强	A听 18%	B说 6%	C读 44%	D写 18%	E译 14%
5.英语听、说、读、写、译几种能力中，你自己最想提高哪(几)方面能力	A听 25.45%	B说 30.91%	C读 10.91%	D写 12.73%	E译 20%
6.与专业课程相比，你对大学英语课程学习投入的时间	A最多 0%	B比较多 2.94%	C基本相当 29.41%	D比较少 50%	E最少 17.65%
7.大学英语课程结束之后，你是否坚持学习或使用英语	A一直坚持学习 7.27%	B基本坚持学习 9.09%	C偶尔学习 34.55%	D不学习 5.45%
	E一直坚持使用 1.82%	F基本坚持使用 7.27%	G偶尔使用 20%	H不使用 14.55%
8.你认为专业课是否应该设立双语课	A应该 70.59%	B不好说 26.47%	C不应该 2.94%	D其他 0%
9.你认为双语课教学应该如何处理专业知识和英语的关系	A侧重专业 41.18%	B侧重英语 29.41%	C两者并重 29.41%	D其他 0%
10.你认为专业课全英文教学中英语使用率应该在	A 100% 5.88%	B 90%以上 29.41%	C 80%以上 52.94%	D其他 11.76%

统计项目	材化11 (材化11班)	材化12 (材化12班)	材化13 (材化13班)	材化14 (材化141、142班)	材化15 (材化151、152班)
每届总人数	35	35	43	52	71
最高分	96	97	97	98	98
最低分	60	60	60	60	61
100–90分人数(所占百分比)	9 (25.7%)	9 (25.7%)	11 (25.6%)	13 (25%)	12 (16.9%)
89-80分人数(所占百分比)	13 (37.1%)	18 (51.4%)	13 (30.2%)	24 (46.1%)	34 (47.9%)
79–70分人数(所占百分比)	6 (17.2%)	5 (14.3%)	14 (32.6%)	8 (15.4%)	11 (15.5%)
69–60分人数(所占百分比)	7 (20%)	3 (8.6%)	5 (11.6%)	7 (13.5%)	14 (19.7%)
平均分	81.57	83.46	81.44	83.67	80.75
优良率	62.8%	77.1%	55.8%	71.1%	64.8%
按试卷划分的统计组	1组	1组	2组	2组	3组

1	夏锦文; 程晓樵. 中国大学教学, 2009, (12), 25.
2	张玉能. 青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 27 (4), 113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8372.2011.04.024
3	马吉平. 湖北第二师范学院学报, 2014, 31 (3), 120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-344X.2014.03.034
4	徐玲琳; 杨晓杰; 孙振平; 张国防. 教育现代化, 2018, 7 (31), 215.
5	王丽萍. 高等理科教育, 2013, (6), 107.
6	王丽萍. 中国冶金教育, 2014, (5), 60.

[1]	Linlin Wang, Yanqin Chen, Feng Li, Ruikang Tan. Practical Exploration of Graded Teaching in the Public Organic Chemistry Course for Agricultural Science Students [J]. University Chemistry, 2025, 40(7): 48-54.
[2]	Yongmei Liu, Lisen Sun, Yongmei Hao, Zhanxiang Liu, Shuyong Zhang. Innovative Design of Chemistry Experiment Courses with Ideological and Political Education: A Case Study of Catalytic Hydrogen Production Experiments [J]. University Chemistry, 2025, 40(5): 224-229.
[3]	Shuang Yang, Qun Wang, Caiqin Miao, Ziqi Geng, Xinran Li, Yang Li, Xiaohong Wu. Ideological and Political Education Design for Research-Oriented Experimental Course of Highly Efficient Hydrogen Production from Water Electrolysis in Aerospace Perspective [J]. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(11): 269-277.
[4]	Simin Fang, Hong Wu, Lingling Li, Yuxi Wang, Hongchun Li, Jun Jiang, Guoqing Zhang. Construction and Implementation of the General Education Course “Kitchen Chemistry” [J]. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(10): 396-401.
[5]	Lili Guan, Ying Cai, Jinling Song, Shuyan Xiao, Feng Hu, Xin Zhao. Exploration and Practice of Blended Teaching Mode in the Structural Chemistry Course [J]. University Chemistry, 2022, 37(3): 2105029-.
[6]	Zhanxiang Liu, Zhenjun Mao, Dongbei Shao, Minrui Qin, Guochun Lan, Huangju Cai, Huarong Zhao. Teaching Practice of Organic Synthesis Laboratory Course Based on the Combination of Research and Systematicness [J]. University Chemistry, 2022, 37(2): 2109076-.
[7]	Chunfang Zhang, Ziyang Liu, Zilin Zhao, Lüjie Fan, Zan Zhang, Yanli Shang, Shuying Huo, Gang Ma. Exploration of Research-Oriented Teaching in Colleges: Theoretical Calculations and Simulations of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for Aromatic Hydrocarbons [J]. University Chemistry, 2022, 37(12): 2205012-0.
[8]	Yanqiong Yang, Dexing Huang, Chengdong Xu. Practice and Effect of Innovative Teaching of Inorganic Chemistry Principles in Colleges [J]. University Chemistry, 2022, 37(11): 2201029-0.
[9]	Wenyan Dan, Lulu Kong, Xiaogang Wang. The Phenomena of AIE and ACQ in the Photoluminescence Spectrum Experiment of Organic Molecules [J]. University Chemistry, 2022, 37(1): 2103058-.
[10]	Yang Deng, Wenjuan Guan. Research and Practice of Implementing Argumentation during the Course of "Chemical Pedagogy" in Normal University [J]. University Chemistry, 2021, 36(7): 2009076-.
[11]	Leqin He, Chengcheng Shi, Yongjing Hao, Shuai Han, Xiaocai Meng, Jiajia Yang, Lianwei Kang. Teaching Practice on Course Ideology and Politics for Student-Centered Physical Chemistry Experiment [J]. University Chemistry, 2021, 36(7): 2102015-.
[12]	Quanqin Zhao, Shuyong Zhang. Enhance Teaching Effectiveness of General Medical Chemistry by Teaching Reform [J]. University Chemistry, 2020, 35(8): 39-43.
[13]	Huizhe LU,Li ZHANG,Hongxia DUAN,Chen MA. Exploration and Practice in the Curriculum Construction of Structural Chemistry [J]. University Chemistry, 2018, 33(2): 36-39.
[14]	Shuyong ZHANG,Yaxian ZHU,Jianrong ZHANG. Overall Design and Implementation Suggestions for Laboratory Teaching Reform of Chemistry Majors [J]. University Chemistry, 2018, 33(10): 1-6.
[15]	Yuan ZHUANG,Jie-Min LIU,Zhe YAO. The Teaching Mode of the Chemistry Experiment and Scientific Research Method Course [J]. University Chemistry, 2017, 32(7): 44-47.

Discussion on the Teaching Effects of Lectures in English Based on Questionnaire Surveys of Organic Material Chemistry

RichHTML

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 6

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0